A New Englander's Take on Golf
January 8, 2025
Awesome look at a course, Turnberry, that should be in the Open Championship, but isn't.

As resolutions go, choosing to ignore any invitation to argue is a strong one. But with conviction it’s been adopted for 2025 and my year in golf will be better because of it. Arguing produces stress and needless angst, which in turn spoil a game that consumes and enthralls me.

To support this resolution not to argue, it makes sense to just announce where my stance is right now and get it over with. No reason to engage in arguments if the mind is made up, right? So here is where the line in the sand has been drawn and there’s no interest at this end should you want to wager an argument:

* Seve remains the most charismatic and energizing golfer the game’s ever seen. Yeah, Tiger included. Do yourself a favor and google “Billy Foster talks about Seve” and settle in for pure brilliance.

* Speaking of Tiger, we all thought he was utterly unbeatable in the WGCs and at Bay Hill – then along came data-driven silliness called the PIP. The man plays a handful of less-than-pedestrian rounds of golf and walks away king of the PIP like he’s in 2000 mode. A cool $10m for doing what, exactly? Now that’s the definition of unbeatable. Go figure.

* Perfect segue into this: Tiger’s 2000 season was way better than Scottie Scheffler’s 2024 campaign but just to add another wrinkle, let’s talk about Ben Hogan’s 1953 effort. At 41 he was severely limited as to how much he could walk because of a horrific car accident four years earlier, so he played in only five regular events. He won all five, including three-for-three in the majors, one being The Open Championship in which he’d never played and where he was required to do a 36-hole qualifier. So, yeah, his ’53 season gets the nod over Tiger’s 2000 season given the extreme physical hardships he worked to overcome and the fact he didn’t once fly private.

* It's not golf, but let’s get this over with: Orr was better than Gretzky. Now that that’s settled . . .

* No, no, a thousand times no to this outcry to allow a free drop out of a divot hole. What’s with this movement to try make the game fair and perfect and kindhearted? The game is often unfair, it asks you to accept imperfections, and it can be downright cruel. There are endless video clips of golfers hitting brilliant shots from water or off cart paths so the challenge of hitting a golf ball from a divot hole can be met. When your errant tee shot slams into a tree and caroms into the middle of the fairway, you smile at this rub of the green stuff, right? Should we allow golfers to get relief from divot holes, it will be reminiscent of all those times when players wanted to tap down spike marks, so they’d ask a competitor, “pitch mark?” The competitor, who’d want the same wink, wink later would concur that it was a pitch mark and so the area was cleaned up and spike marks were matted down. Players will similarly see divot holes where there aren’t any and we’ll have free drops all day long. Play it as it lies – quickly, please – and let’s stop trying to hurt player’s feelings when they get a bad break. Chances are, they’ll get a massively good break later in the round.

* Likely, this decision will not be re-visited, but it’s a shame that Turnberry is not in the Open Championship rota. Such a fantastic competitive arena.

* As for those rakes that are provided by golf course superintendents so that players can (hopefully) clean up the bunkers, the 80-20 rule should be in effect: 80 percent of the rake left in the bunker, 20 percent of it outside. And always, leave the rakes entry point of the bunker, which is the low side.

* Nothing bores me as quickly as stories about who some guy has gone to as his swing coach or his short-game coach or his putting coach. It’s never that newsworthy; it’s a writer thinking readers will be impressed that he knows something deep in the recesses of inside golf.

* This obsession with how much money is being thrown at players on the PGA Tour is very curious, methinks. Viewers turn on in droves to watch Patrick Mahomes and Josh Allen and never is anything about money discussed. The best sports TV of the year occurs in the early rounds of the Stanley Cup playoffs and money is never talked about. Elite athletes earn extraordinary money. Old news. But we tune in to watch their golf talents, not be hit over the head with their bank statements.

* Yeah, sure, the Plantation Course is a total pushover. That’s why Hideki Matsuyama won this year’s Sentry Championship with eye-popping 257 score. But how is it that he finished second-from-last a year ago with 286 score, 29 shots higher? Guessing maybe he played better, the course was soft, and there was an absence of wind. True answer is this: The fact is the game is utterly unexplainable and no one can tell me any differently.

* The Euros see the Ryder Cup differently, hence the tempered attitude toward those who fled to play LIV Golf. It’s all about fielding the best competitive team, not applying personal vendettas, so expect Jon Rahm to be on the team in ’25 and here’s guessing that Sergio Garcia will be a captain in the near future.

I have a passion for playing golf that is surpassed only by my passion for writing about people who have a passion for playing golf, for working in golf, for living their lives around golf. Chasing the best professional golfers around the world for The Boston Globe, Golfweek Magazine, and the PGA Tour for more than 20 years was a blessing for which I’ll be eternally grateful. I’ve been left with precious memories of golf at its very best, but here is a takeaway that rates even more valuable – the game belongs to everyone who loves it. “Power Fades” is a weekly tribute with that in mind, a digital production to celebrate a game that many of us embrace. If you share a passion for golf, sign up down below for a free subscription and join the ride. Should you have suggestions, thoughts, critiques, or general comments, pass them along. And if you’d like to support “Power Fades” with contributing sponsorships or advertisements, you can contact me. Jim@powerfades.com

1 – Slow starts aren’t unusual

Before you speculate on how this bad cut in his right hand will get Scottie Scheffler out of the starting games with a crawl in 2025, consider this: He failed to capture any of his first five starts in 2024 and was winless until March. From which point he went on to win seven of his next 14 starts.


2 – One of us is not like the other

Unlike Hideki Matsuyama, who doesn’t like his great shots, hates his good shots, and rarely hits a bad shot, I sort of like my bad shots, adore my good shots, and rarely hit a great shot.


3 – Easy money

Organizers of TGL, the simulator golf league that features many of the elite PGA Tour names, concede they are using “paid sitters” to fill out the indoor venue in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. Further research is being done by yours truly to see if these “paid sitters” get stipends for hot dogs, popcorn, and beers, in which case I’m all for it.


4 – Could it get easier?

If these “sitters” sit nicely, cheer passionately, and pick up after themselves, are they eligible for PIP money?


5 – Nuts, try ‘em

Here’s a strategy that’s employed when it’s time to sit and type: Keep two small bowls close by, one filled with pistachios, the other for the shells to be discarded. You’re welcome.


6 – An eagle is -2, a double-eagle would be -4

Should you call it a “double-eagle” and refuse to correct yourself (it’s an albatross), shame on you. Consider yourself on suspension, though I’m not quite sure from what.


7 – Melancholy

It’s a hollow feeling, this act of tossing your Christmas tree to the curb. Only thing I can compare it to is playing the 18th with a deft par then realizing it might not be for another year that I close out my round so nicely.


8 – Hey, it’s new to this year

So an old friend greeted me with a “What’s new?” the other day and I promptly answered, “Viktor Hovland’s double-pump at the top of his swing is back.” He shot me a quizzical look, but what the heck, he asked and I answered.


9 – Well, which is it?

Years of flying and it’s still befuddling. I’ve been told it’s a “full flight” and a “very full flight” and an “extremely full flight” and a “totally full flight” and a “100 percent full flight.” Which level represents the most crowded?


 

© Power Fades. All Rights Reserved.
26 McKinnon Ave., Milton, MA 02186